Link to Pubmed [PMID] – 39514774
Link to DOI – 10.1093/molbev/msae238
Mol Biol Evol 2024 Nov; ():
Felsenstein’s bootstrap is the most commonly used method to measure branch support in phylogenetics. Current sequencing technologies can result in massive sampling of taxa (e.g. SARS-CoV-2). In this case, the sequences are very similar, the trees are short, and the branches correspond to a small number of mutations (possibly 0). Nevertheless, these trees contain a strong signal, with unresolved parts but a low rate of false branches. With such data, Felsenstein’s bootstrap is not satisfactory. Due to the frequentist nature of bootstrap sampling, the expected support of a branch corresponding to a single mutation is ∼63%, even though it is highly likely to be correct. Here we propose a Bayesian version of the phylogenetic bootstrap in which sites are assigned uninformative prior probabilities. The branch support can then be interpreted as a posterior probability. We do not view the alignment as a small subsample of a large sample of sites, but rather as containing all available information (e.g., as with complete viral genomes, which are becoming routine). We give formulas for expected supports under the assumption of perfect phylogeny, in both the frequentist and Bayesian frameworks, where a branch corresponding to a single mutation now has an expected support of ∼90%. Simulations show that these theoretical results are robust to realistic data. Analyses on low-homoplasy viral and non-viral datasets show that Bayesian bootstrap support is easier to interpret, with high supports for branches very likely to be correct. As homoplasy increases, the two supports become closer and strongly correlated.
See also: Bboot