Search anything and hit enter
  • Teams
  • Members
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Calls
  • Jobs
  • publications
  • Software
  • Tools
  • Network
  • Equipment

A little guide for advanced search:

  • Tip 1. You can use quotes "" to search for an exact expression.
    Example: "cell division"
  • Tip 2. You can use + symbol to restrict results containing all words.
    Example: +cell +stem
  • Tip 3. You can use + and - symbols to force inclusion or exclusion of specific words.
    Example: +cell -stem
e.g. searching for members in projects tagged cancer
Search for
Count
IN
OUT
Content 1
  • member
  • team
  • department
  • center
  • program_project
  • nrc
  • whocc
  • project
  • software
  • tool
  • patent
  • Administrative Staff
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Clinical Research Assistant
  • Clinical Research Nurse
  • Clinician Researcher
  • Department Manager
  • Dual-education Student
  • Full Professor
  • Honorary Professor
  • Lab assistant
  • Master Student
  • MD-PhD Student
  • Medical Staff
  • Non-permanent Researcher
  • Nursing Staff
  • Permanent Researcher
  • Pharmacist
  • PhD Student
  • Physician
  • Post-doc
  • Prize
  • Project Manager
  • Research Associate
  • Research Engineer
  • Retired scientist
  • Technician
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Veterinary
  • Visiting Scientist
  • Deputy Director of Center
  • Deputy Director of Department
  • Deputy Director of National Reference Center
  • Deputy Head of Facility
  • Director of Center
  • Director of Department
  • Director of Institute
  • Director of National Reference Center
  • Group Leader
  • Head of Facility
  • Head of Operations
  • Head of Structure
  • Honorary President of the Departement
  • Labex Coordinator
Content 2
  • member
  • team
  • department
  • center
  • program_project
  • nrc
  • whocc
  • project
  • software
  • tool
  • patent
  • Administrative Staff
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Clinical Research Assistant
  • Clinical Research Nurse
  • Clinician Researcher
  • Department Manager
  • Dual-education Student
  • Full Professor
  • Honorary Professor
  • Lab assistant
  • Master Student
  • MD-PhD Student
  • Medical Staff
  • Non-permanent Researcher
  • Nursing Staff
  • Permanent Researcher
  • Pharmacist
  • PhD Student
  • Physician
  • Post-doc
  • Prize
  • Project Manager
  • Research Associate
  • Research Engineer
  • Retired scientist
  • Technician
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Veterinary
  • Visiting Scientist
  • Deputy Director of Center
  • Deputy Director of Department
  • Deputy Director of National Reference Center
  • Deputy Head of Facility
  • Director of Center
  • Director of Department
  • Director of Institute
  • Director of National Reference Center
  • Group Leader
  • Head of Facility
  • Head of Operations
  • Head of Structure
  • Honorary President of the Departement
  • Labex Coordinator
Search

← Go to Research

Go back
Scroll to top
Share
© Research
Publication : Medecine sciences : M/S

Reporting the overall results of the research to the participants: issues, barriers and areas for improvement.

Scientific Fields
Diseases
Organisms
Applications
Technique

Published in Medecine sciences : M/S - 01 Jan 2025

Momboisse F, Fournié J, Richard B, Artus R

Link to Pubmed [PMID] – 39887100

Link to DOI – 10.1051/medsci/2024189

Med Sci (Paris) 2025 Jan; 41(1): 63-67

The overall results of a research project represent a synthesis of the individual results obtained from the participants, which together lead to the conclusions of the research. The importance of informing participants is emphasised in the recommendations on research ethics. However, this good practice is not systematic and can present various challenges in its implementation, despite the fact that participants often express a desire to be informed. The potential advantages and disadvantages of this method raise questions for researchers, who have the task of conveying a coherent message to all parties, while at the same time addressing the lack of guidance on this practice. Potential avenues for improvement include expending the body of ethics literature on the subject and developing comprehensive guidelines to provide optimal support for research teams using this practice.Le retour des résultats globaux des recherches aux participants – Enjeux, freins et pistes d’amélioration.Lorsque des recherches impliquent des participants et/ou leurs échantillons et données, les recommandations en éthique de la recherche mentionnent l’importance de les informer des résultats globaux de celles-ci. Or, cette pratique vertueuse n’est pas systématique et peut présenter des enjeux divers, notamment dans sa mise en œuvre. Les possibles conséquences négatives et le manque de moyens interrogent les équipes de recherche. Dans un contexte nécessaire d’ouverture de la science vers la société, des pistes d’amélioration doivent être envisagées, notamment en étoffant le corpus de la littérature en éthique relative à ce sujet et en produisant des lignes directrices claires et détaillées, afin d’accompagner au mieux les équipes de recherche dans cette pratique.