Search anything and hit enter
  • Teams
  • Members
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Calls
  • Jobs
  • publications
  • Software
  • Tools
  • Network
  • Equipment

A little guide for advanced search:

  • Tip 1. You can use quotes "" to search for an exact expression.
    Example: "cell division"
  • Tip 2. You can use + symbol to restrict results containing all words.
    Example: +cell +stem
  • Tip 3. You can use + and - symbols to force inclusion or exclusion of specific words.
    Example: +cell -stem
e.g. searching for members in projects tagged cancer
Search for
Count
IN
OUT
Content 1
  • member
  • team
  • department
  • center
  • program_project
  • nrc
  • whocc
  • project
  • software
  • tool
  • patent
  • Administrative Staff
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Clinical Research Assistant
  • Clinical Research Nurse
  • Clinician Researcher
  • Department Manager
  • Dual-education Student
  • Full Professor
  • Honorary Professor
  • Lab assistant
  • Master Student
  • MD-PhD Student
  • Medical Staff
  • Non-permanent Researcher
  • Nursing Staff
  • Permanent Researcher
  • Pharmacist
  • PhD Student
  • Physician
  • Post-doc
  • Prize
  • Project Manager
  • Research Associate
  • Research Engineer
  • Retired scientist
  • Technician
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Veterinary
  • Visiting Scientist
  • Deputy Director of Center
  • Deputy Director of Department
  • Deputy Director of National Reference Center
  • Deputy Head of Facility
  • Director of Center
  • Director of Department
  • Director of Institute
  • Director of National Reference Center
  • Group Leader
  • Head of Facility
  • Head of Operations
  • Head of Structure
  • Honorary President of the Departement
  • Labex Coordinator
Content 2
  • member
  • team
  • department
  • center
  • program_project
  • nrc
  • whocc
  • project
  • software
  • tool
  • patent
  • Administrative Staff
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Clinical Research Assistant
  • Clinical Research Nurse
  • Clinician Researcher
  • Department Manager
  • Dual-education Student
  • Full Professor
  • Honorary Professor
  • Lab assistant
  • Master Student
  • MD-PhD Student
  • Medical Staff
  • Non-permanent Researcher
  • Nursing Staff
  • Permanent Researcher
  • Pharmacist
  • PhD Student
  • Physician
  • Post-doc
  • Prize
  • Project Manager
  • Research Associate
  • Research Engineer
  • Retired scientist
  • Technician
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Veterinary
  • Visiting Scientist
  • Deputy Director of Center
  • Deputy Director of Department
  • Deputy Director of National Reference Center
  • Deputy Head of Facility
  • Director of Center
  • Director of Department
  • Director of Institute
  • Director of National Reference Center
  • Group Leader
  • Head of Facility
  • Head of Operations
  • Head of Structure
  • Honorary President of the Departement
  • Labex Coordinator
Search
Go back
Scroll to top
Share
© Research
Publication : The Journal of infectious diseases

Whose line is it anyway? Defining sero-positivity cut-offs for infectious disease surveillance.

Scientific Fields
Diseases
Organisms
Applications
Technique

Published in The Journal of infectious diseases - 17 Oct 2025

White MT, Baudemont G, Donnadieu F, Diatta AS, Sarr I, Diagne A, Toure-Balde A, Sarr FD, Faye J, Sokhna C, Bassene H, Vigan-Womas I, Pelleau S, Niang M

Link to Pubmed [PMID] – 41108092

Link to DOI – 10.1093/infdis/jiaf537

J Infect Dis 2025 Oct; ():

Serological assays are key tools in infectious disease surveillance, enabling detection of past infections by measuring antibody responses. Determining appropriate sero-positivity cut-offs, thresholds distinguishing between positive and negative antibody responses, remains a critical methodological challenge.We present a framework for selecting sero-positivity cut-offs based on immunoassay characteristics, availability of validation samples, and intended use case. Four principal methods are evaluated: Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves based on confirmed positive and negative samples; the Negative Sample Distribution method when only negative controls are available; the Positive Sample Distribution method for scenarios with only positive controls; and Mixture Models for samples of unknown sero-status. Each method’s assumptions, advantages, and limitations are detailed, and guidance is provided for selecting the most appropriate approach under varying constraints.The framework is first illustrated using simulated data, and then applied to data from multiplex serological surveys of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) in the Senegalese villages of Dielmo and Ndiop. We demonstrate that no universal approach suffices across pathogens or populations. Cross-reactive antibody responses, variations in total IgG levels between populations, and assay-specific features can all confound interpretation.We advocate for a context-dependent, evidence-based selection of cut-off methodologies, informed by panels of confirmed positive and negative samples. As multiplex serological platforms become increasingly central to integrated disease surveillance, robust frameworks for interpreting antibody data are needed. Our proposed framework offers a pragmatic path forward, bridging immunological theory and statistical rigor to improve the reliability and comparability of sero-epidemiological insights across diverse epidemiological settings.