Search anything and hit enter
  • Teams
  • Members
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Calls
  • Jobs
  • publications
  • Software
  • Tools
  • Network
  • Equipment

A little guide for advanced search:

  • Tip 1. You can use quotes "" to search for an exact expression.
    Example: "cell division"
  • Tip 2. You can use + symbol to restrict results containing all words.
    Example: +cell +stem
  • Tip 3. You can use + and - symbols to force inclusion or exclusion of specific words.
    Example: +cell -stem
e.g. searching for members in projects tagged cancer
Search for
Count
IN
OUT
Content 1
  • member
  • team
  • department
  • center
  • program_project
  • nrc
  • whocc
  • project
  • software
  • tool
  • patent
  • Administrative Staff
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Clinical Research Assistant
  • Clinical Research Nurse
  • Clinician Researcher
  • Department Manager
  • Dual-education Student
  • Full Professor
  • Honorary Professor
  • Lab assistant
  • Master Student
  • Non-permanent Researcher
  • Nursing Staff
  • Permanent Researcher
  • Pharmacist
  • PhD Student
  • Physician
  • Post-doc
  • Prize
  • Project Manager
  • Research Associate
  • Research Engineer
  • Retired scientist
  • Technician
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Veterinary
  • Visiting Scientist
  • Deputy Director of Center
  • Deputy Director of Department
  • Deputy Director of National Reference Center
  • Deputy Head of Facility
  • Director of Center
  • Director of Department
  • Director of Institute
  • Director of National Reference Center
  • Group Leader
  • Head of Facility
  • Head of Operations
  • Head of Structure
  • Honorary President of the Departement
  • Labex Coordinator
Content 2
  • member
  • team
  • department
  • center
  • program_project
  • nrc
  • whocc
  • project
  • software
  • tool
  • patent
  • Administrative Staff
  • Assistant Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Clinical Research Assistant
  • Clinical Research Nurse
  • Clinician Researcher
  • Department Manager
  • Dual-education Student
  • Full Professor
  • Honorary Professor
  • Lab assistant
  • Master Student
  • Non-permanent Researcher
  • Nursing Staff
  • Permanent Researcher
  • Pharmacist
  • PhD Student
  • Physician
  • Post-doc
  • Prize
  • Project Manager
  • Research Associate
  • Research Engineer
  • Retired scientist
  • Technician
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Veterinary
  • Visiting Scientist
  • Deputy Director of Center
  • Deputy Director of Department
  • Deputy Director of National Reference Center
  • Deputy Head of Facility
  • Director of Center
  • Director of Department
  • Director of Institute
  • Director of National Reference Center
  • Group Leader
  • Head of Facility
  • Head of Operations
  • Head of Structure
  • Honorary President of the Departement
  • Labex Coordinator
Search

← Go to Research

Go back
Scroll to top
Share
© Research
Publication : Contact dermatitis

Gradient boosting approaches can outperform logistic regression for risk prediction in cutaneous allergy.

Scientific Fields
Diseases
Organisms
Applications
Technique

Published in Contact dermatitis - 01 Mar 2022

Cunningham L, Ganier C, Ferguson F, White IR, Watt FM, McFadden J, Lynch MD

Link to Pubmed [PMID] – 34812539

Link to DOI – 10.1111/cod.14011

Contact Dermatitis 2022 Mar; 86(3): 165-174

Contact allergy is a major clinical and public health challenge. It is important to identify individuals who are at risk and perform patch testing to identify relevant allergens. Predicting clinical risk on the basis of input parameters is common in clinical medicine and traditionally has been achieved with linear models.We hypothesized that the risk of a clinically relevant positive patch test could be predicted according to clinical and demographic parameters.We compared the predictive accuracy of logistic regression with more sophisticated machine learning approaches such as gradient boosting, in the prediction of patch testing results.We found that both logistic regression and more sophisticated machine learning approaches were able to predict the risk of positive patch tests. For certain predictions, including the overall risk of a clinically relevant positive patch test, gradient boosting approaches can outperform logistic regression.These findings suggest that complex nonlinear interactions between input variables are relevant in risk prediction. While a risk prediction model cannot replace the judgment of an experienced clinician, quantifying the risk of a clinically relevant positive patch test result has the potential to assist in decision making and to inform discussions with patients.